Most left after fees
BettermentWorth $703 over 10 years on these balances and contributions.
SwitchWize decision guide
Both invest you in diversified index funds, so the portfolios are close enough that the return does not decide this. The advisory fee does. One charges a flat monthly fee at small balances and a percentage above them; the other charges nothing until a threshold and more once you pass it. Your balance crosses those thresholds partway through, which is why a single rate applied to a final balance gets the answer wrong.
What you can expect
Quick answer
If betterment
Better once the balance is large enough that its percentage fee undercuts the alternative, and where you would genuinely use the goal and harvesting tools.
If fidelity Go
Better at small balances, where it charges no advisory fee at all and a flat monthly fee elsewhere would be a large percentage of the account.
Key number to watch
Your balance reaches the pricing threshold in month 7, and the fee changes from that month on rather than retroactively.
Test your situation
Change any number below to match your situation. No login is required. Saved decisions stay on this device, and signed-in users can revisit them across devices.
What kind of account?
Tax-loss harvesting is worth nothing inside an IRA, so this changes what counts.
Where you are relative to each pricing threshold decides most of this.
A recurring deposit can itself qualify you for different pricing.
Longer horizons let a small fee difference compound.
Your answer so far
Betterment leaves about $703 more after fees. Over the period the fees come to $1,597 and $2,176.
See the full breakdownBetterment leaves about $703 more after fees. Over the period the fees come to $1,597 and $2,176.
Betterment
$115,913
projected after 10 years
Fidelity Go
$115,210
projected after 10 years
-$703 vs. baseline
Try a scenario
What could change this
Your balance reaches the pricing threshold in month 7, and the fee changes from that month on rather than retroactively.
How certain: moderate
Harvesting is real and not guaranteed. It depends on market falls happening at the right time and on you having gains to offset, so the default here is zero rather than a provider estimate.
How certain: scenario dependent
Worth $703 over 10 years on these balances and contributions.
A provider that charges nothing below a threshold beats a flat monthly fee at small balances, and the flat fee is a larger percentage the smaller the account.
Harvesting, rebalancing and goal tools differ, and none of them carries a dollar figure here unless you supply one.
Real, not guaranteed, and worth nothing inside an IRA.
Both price in tiers, so the answer depends on where you sit and when you cross.
Educational illustration only. The right amount depends on your needs and timing.
Question 1
Yes: The provider charging nothing is ahead, often by a wide margin.
No: Both charge a percentage, so compare the percentages.
Question 2
Yes: Compare that percentage against the flat fee on your balance.
No: The flat fee applies, so work out what percentage it really is.
Question 3
Yes: Harvesting can matter, though it is not guaranteed.
No: Harvesting is worth nothing here, so ignore it entirely.
Both are assumed to hold broadly similar diversified portfolios earning the same return, so return cancels out and this is a fee comparison. Advisory fees are charged monthly against that month’s balance, which is how the providers bill and why a threshold crossed partway through changes pricing from that month rather than retroactively. Underlying fund expenses are deducted from the return on both sides. A fee can never take the balance below zero. Tax-loss harvesting defaults to zero, is treated as the reader’s assumption when supplied, and is never applied to a tax-advantaged account. Tax on selling an existing portfolio to move it is charged once.
Fee schedules and thresholds are reported facts with an expiry. If a schedule is stale the guide abstains rather than pricing from it, because a fee comparison built on an old fee schedule is worthless.
Fee schedules re-checked on every page build; the guide reviewed monthly. Editorial conclusions do not depend on affiliate availability.
Flat monthly fee ($5 a month under $24,000), the recurring-deposit waiver ($200 a month), and the percentage advisory fee (0.25% a year).
No advisory fee under $25,000, then 0.35% a year; $10 to start investing; limited tax-loss harvesting.
It depends entirely on your balance. Below the no-fee threshold Fidelity Go charges no advisory fee and a flat monthly fee elsewhere is a large percentage of a small account. Above the threshold both charge a percentage and the percentages differ, so the ranking can reverse. The calculator finds the month your balance crosses and prices the years either side separately.
Divide it by your balance. Five dollars a month on three thousand dollars is two percent a year, which is many times any advisory rate on this page. That is why a flat fee looks small and is not, and why the recurring-deposit route into percentage pricing is worth checking.
It is real and it is not guaranteed. It needs markets to fall at the right time and needs you to have gains to offset, so this guide defaults it to zero and treats any figure you enter as your assumption rather than a projection. Inside an IRA it is worth nothing at all, because there are no taxable gains to offset.
No. An IRA is already tax-advantaged, so there is nothing to offset. This guide sets the benefit to zero for IRAs rather than quietly applying it, because carrying it across would credit a benefit that cannot exist.
Moving a taxable portfolio usually means selling it, and that realises gains you then owe tax on. That cost is charged once here, not every year, and it often outweighs several years of fee difference. Ask for the figure before you compare fees.
Yes. The advisory fee is not the only fee. The funds inside the portfolio charge their own expense ratio, and it comes out of the return before the advisory fee is even applied. This guide deducts it from both sides.
Neither, in any way worth planning around. Both hold diversified index portfolios, and the difference between them is fees rather than returns. Any comparison showing one robo-advisor with materially better returns is comparing particular past periods, not the services.
Get the week's biggest rate changes in savings, CDs and mortgages, free.