Most platform value over your holding period
not applicableRequired fact is missing: options_contract_fee
SwitchWize decision guide
The investments are the same, so the market return is the same and cancels out entirely. What differs is platform economics: a match that has to be earned and kept, a subscription that has to be paid, and fees that only apply if you trade in particular ways. Anything that shows one brokerage earning a better return is comparing portfolios rather than brokers.
What you can expect
Quick answer
If schwab
Better when you want branches, advisory access, a wide fund range, or when no match applies to your account type.
If robinhood
Better when the IRA match genuinely clears the subscription cost and you will hold long enough to keep it.
Key number to watch
Required fact is missing: options_contract_fee
Test your situation
Change any number below to match your situation. No login is required, and your entries stay in this browser.
What kind of account?
This changes the whole comparison rather than adjusting it. A match applies to IRAs only.
What you expect to put in each year.
Compare this against the match retention requirement below.
Your answer so far
We are not comparing brokers on match or fee terms we cannot currently stand behind.
See the full breakdownWe are not comparing brokers on match or fee terms we cannot currently stand behind.
We are not showing a winner for this one
schwab
Not modeled
modeled after-tax interest
robinhood
Not modeled
modeled after-tax interest
Try a scenario
What could change this
Required fact is missing: options_contract_fee
How certain: scenario dependent
Required fact is missing: options_contract_fee
A match you give back is not a benefit.
Two questions settle most of this before any arithmetic.
Educational illustration only. The right amount depends on your needs and timing.
Question 1
Yes: A match may apply, so continue.
No: No match applies. Judge on fees, execution and service.
Question 2
Yes: The match is genuinely yours.
No: It will be taken back, so do not count it.
Question 3
Yes: Robinhood is ahead on platform economics.
No: The subscription is costing you more than the match returns.
Both brokerages are assumed to hold the same investments earning the same return, so market return cancels out and only platform economics are compared. A match is treated as ordinary money in the account and compounds. Subscription cost is a flat annual charge. Options fees are charged per contract, and broker-assisted and OTC trades are priced separately. Where a retention requirement is not met, the match is not counted at all.
Fee schedules are reported facts with an expiry. Match rates and promotions change often, so a stale term abstains rather than being carried forward.
Fee and match terms re-checked on every page build; the guide reviewed monthly. Editorial conclusions do not depend on affiliate availability.
It depends on three things: whether the account is an IRA at all, whether the match clears the subscription cost on your contribution size, and whether you will hold long enough to keep it. On a small contribution a flat subscription can cost more than the match returns, which the calculator shows as a break-even match rate.
No. It is an IRA feature, and this guide sets it to zero for taxable accounts rather than quietly applying it. That single distinction changes the answer more than anything else on the page.
On current terms the matched money is removed. This guide does not count a match you would have to give back, so a short holding period simply shows the match as zero rather than as a headline with a footnote.
Neither. The same investments earn the same return wherever they are held, which is why this comparison deliberately cancels market return out and looks only at platform economics. Any comparison showing one brokerage with better returns is comparing portfolios, not brokers.
Per contract, not per trade. A single trade of a hundred contracts costs a hundred times the per-contract fee, and using trade count would understate an active options trader substantially.
Execution quality, payment for order flow, cash sweep yields, margin rates, research and service. Several of those are real and none has an honest dollar figure, so they are listed as capability rather than scored.
Plenty of people do: an IRA where the match is, and a taxable account where the service and fund range are. There is no rule against it, and no transfer cost to holding both from the start.