Highest modeled comparable after-tax value
Traditional IRAThe traditional-plus-reinvested-tax-savings path is about $1,636.91 higher in this comparable after-tax scenario.
SwitchWize decision guide
A fair comparison must account for deduction eligibility and what happens to current tax savings—not just apply a future tax rate to equal deposits.
What you can expect
Quick answer
If roth ira
Best when eligible and future tax-free qualified withdrawals or no owner lifetime RMDs are valuable.
If traditional ira
Best when the contribution is deductible, today’s rate is higher and tax savings are reinvested.
Key number to watch
The comparable-value boundary is about a 22.3% retirement tax rate under the entered reinvestment assumptions.
Test your situation
Change any number below to match your situation. No login is required, and your entries stay in this browser.
Combined 2026 IRA limit is $7,500, or $8,600 at 50+.
Contribution horizon.
Same hypothetical return inside both accounts.
Rate applied to a deductible contribution.
Scenario rate on traditional withdrawals.
Eligibility depends on workplace coverage, filing status and income.
The traditional-plus-reinvested-tax-savings path is about $1,636.91 higher in this comparable after-tax scenario.
Roth IRA
$474,368
modeled qualified after-tax value
Traditional IRA
$476,005
modeled comparable after-tax value
Try a scenario
Key number to watch
The comparable-value boundary is about a 22.3% retirement tax rate under the entered reinvestment assumptions.
How certain: scenario dependent
Check these assumptions
The traditional-plus-reinvested-tax-savings path is about $1,636.91 higher in this comparable after-tax scenario.
The entered scenario treats the traditional contribution as deductible.
Under current federal rules, Roth IRA owners do not take lifetime required minimum distributions; beneficiaries have separate rules.
Holding both pre-tax and Roth assets can preserve choices when future tax rates and income are uncertain.
Using both account types reduces reliance on one future-rate forecast.
Educational illustration only. The right amount depends on your needs and timing.
Question 1
Yes: Include and reinvest the tax savings.
No: The Roth may compare more favorably if eligible.
Question 2
Yes: Roth becomes more attractive.
No: Traditional may benefit from a current deduction.
Question 3
Yes: Consider a split for diversification.
No: Use the comparable after-tax result as one input.
Both IRAs use the same hypothetical growth. Traditional value is reduced by entered withdrawal tax and adds reinvested current tax savings only when selected.
2026 contribution limits come from IRS guidance; tax rates and eligibility are user-entered.
IRS limits and rules are reviewed annually and after legislation. Editorial conclusions do not depend on affiliate availability.
2026 combined limit and compensation cap.
Deduction and distribution distinctions.
Traditional IRA and Roth-owner RMD treatment.
The combined traditional and Roth IRA limit is $7,500, or $8,600 at age 50 or older, limited by taxable compensation.
Maybe. Workplace coverage, filing status and income can limit the deduction.
No. Qualified-distribution rules must be met.
The original owner does not under current federal rules; beneficiary rules differ.
It makes equal-contribution comparisons closer to equal pre-tax economic resources.
Yes if eligible, but the annual limit is shared across traditional and Roth IRAs.